Protection of the interests of the winning bidder during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it

Protection of the interests of the winning bidder during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it

Each procurement contract, concluded as a result of the procurement procedure through the ProZorro electronic system, must have a section on force majeure (for example, changes in the terms of the contract, terms, etc.). However, this issue was not always given sufficient attention. In most cases, everything was limited to formalism. As practice shows, the relevance of the force majeure section has significantly increased with the beginning of a full-scale war. That is why a relevant service for our clients is the protection of the interests of the winning participant during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it.

What does the concept of force majeure include?

One of the features of the procurement contract is that its draft is part of the tender documentation (hereinafter referred to as the TD). Therefore, the preparation of this draft is the prerogative of the customer.

In the document, the customer forms the essential terms of the future contract, in particular, the terms relating to the occurrence of force majeure circumstances (force majeure).

According to current legislation, such circumstances are understood as an unavoidable and extraordinary influence that objectively makes it impossible to fulfill obligations, duties stipulated by the terms of the contract. If it is proven that the failure to fulfill obligations was due to force majeure, the party to the contract is released from liability.

Protection of the interests of the winning bidder during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it

How to protect the interests of the tender winner?

Our company’s lawyers will analyze whether the circumstances cited by the customer are indeed force majeure (objective, unavoidable and such that prevent the fulfillment of certain obligations within a certain period of time).

For example, problems with logistics, changes in currency exchange rates, difficulties with the supply of materials or raw materials, mobilization of employees involved in the execution of the contract and other circumstances are unexpected, but, taking into account the realities of life, they could have been foreseen. Therefore, they can be qualified as commercial risks, not force majeure. Therefore, the party is not exempted from liability for non-fulfillment of the contract.

It is worth remembering that contractual obligations must be fulfilled immediately after such an opportunity arises. If the contract stipulates that confirmed force majeure circumstances are grounds for terminating the contract, the contract is canceled.

If, for example, the customer is not satisfied with this, the option of terminating the agreement due to a significant change in circumstances (Article 652 of the Civil Code of Ukraine) is considered. Is there a significant difference with force majeure? Of course, the presence of a significant change makes the failure to fulfill the contractual obligation disadvantageous for the party to the contract.

“Significant change in circumstances” is an evaluation category. The main criterion is that the circumstances must have changed so much that if the parties could have somehow foreseen this, they would have concluded the agreement on different terms or refused to sign it at all.

According to part one of Article 652 of the Civil Code, the parties to the agreement may, if such circumstances are established, amend the agreement or terminate it by mutual consent.

That is why we recommend:

  • Pay attention to the fact that force majeure cases are indicated in the procurement agreement in accordance with the specified regulatory acts.
  • If additional circumstances arise that can be described as unavoidable, include them in the list.
  • Indicate the specifics of the procedure for confirming the occurrence of force majeure circumstances in a separate item.

Is it possible to adjust the contract during the signing process?

The answer to this question is unequivocal: during the conclusion of the procurement contract, it is not subject to adjustment. This is a violation of current legislation.

That is why it is best to familiarize yourself with the draft of the future contract at the stage of clarifications. For example, a public procurement participant may contact the customer with a proposal or question regarding amendments to the tender documentation. If this is not done, it will be considered that the participant has agreed to all the terms of the TD.

We recommend that you remain vigilant and follow the advice of our company’s lawyers to reduce the risks of violating current procurement legislation. We look forward to your consultations!

Calculate the cost of services

1 question

Need help determining whether circumstances truly qualify as force majeure?

Yes
No

2 question

Would you like to receive a legal analysis of your purchase agreement before signing?

Yes
No

3 question

Do you need legal support when concluding or executing a procurement contract?

Yes
No

4 question

Need the service urgently?

Yes
No
20%
discount
If we do not
call back
during the day
Consultation
Law company
Leave a request for legal assistance right now:
9+ years on the market
70+ professional practitioners
Fixed price
Online / offline consultation

Support of tenders

Analysis of competitors’ bids at the tender Answer to the complaint to the antimonopoly committee Anti-corruption program for tender Appeal against cancellation of purchase Appeal against the rejection of a tender offer Appeal of wrongful disqualification or the decision to determine the winner of the tender Appealing against the unlawful recognition of the winner Appealing decisions of the Antimonopoly Committee Appealing tender procedures through the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Appealing the decision of AMCU on public procurement Appealing the decision of the tender committee Appealing the decisions of tender customers through the court Appealing the tender customer’s decision on disqualification Attorney for tenders and public procurement Audit of tender documentation before publication Certificate of no debt for participation in the tender Challenging the conditions of the tender documentation Challenging the terms of the tender documentation Checking tender documentation for discriminatory benefits Complaint against the tender customer’s decision Complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU) about tender purchases Consultations on public procurement Contesting the procurement results in the Prozorro tender Coordination of changes to the terms and conditions of a public procurement contract Development of individual tender documentation Development of tender documentation Development of tender documentation without discriminatory requirements and violations Disputing the conditions of purchase on Prozoro Explanation to AMKU about the purchase Filing a complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Formation of certificates, letters of guarantee, documents to confirm the qualifications of the tenderer How to announce a tender in Prozorro ISO 9001 certification for participation in the tender Legal support for public procurement in Ukraine Legal support of tenders Legal support of the tender Legal verification of the correctness of the tender proposal Localization of production of goods in public procurement Prozorro Negotiated procurement procedure Preparation and assistance in filing complaints about discriminatory terms of tender documentation Preparation of tender documentation Preparation of tender documentation for bidding with Features Preparation of tender documentation for the tender customer Preparation of the company for the tender Preparing a complaint about the wrongful rejection of the Participant’s proposal Protection in the event of termination of the contract at the initiative of the tender customer Protection of officials of the tender winner during inspections by the AMCU, DASU, Accounting Chamber, NABU Protection of the interests of the Customers in AMKU Protection of the interests of the winning bidder during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it Providing a tender offer to tenderers Representation during the consideration of complaints in the Commission of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for the consideration of complaints about violations of legislation in the field of public procurement (AMCU) Response to the tender complaint in the Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU) Selection of tenders on a turnkey basis Simplified procurement Support of public buyers Support of public procurement appeals at AMKU Support of tender purchases Support of turnkey public tenders Tender lawyer Tender specialist services Tender support Verification of tender offers