Specializes in protection of honor and dignity, of copyrights, inventions, patents, trademarks, support of tenders, protection of consumer rights, disputes with insurance companies, legal support in cases of administrative offenses.

Contact now
Contesting the procurement results in the Prozorro tender

Contesting the procurement results in the Prozorro tender

During participation in tenders, situations often occur when the decisions made may be unfair to one or the other party.

In the current conditions, public procurement should take place as efficiently and quickly as possible. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine established new procurement rules for the period of martial law, thanks to which it was possible to combine these two important factors. An important element is the return of the appeal tool to the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine. Disputing procurement results is one of the areas of work of specialists of “PRIKHODKO & PARTNERS”.

 

Peculiarities of contesting procurement results

All complaints regarding contesting procurement results are submitted through the electronic platform. They are published for any user and are public. The complaint is automatically entered into the register, where its registration card is generated, which is received by the Antimonopoly Committee and the Customer.

 

The following package of documents must be prepared in order to challenge the procurement results:

  • Complaint.
  • Documents (in paper and electronic form). These documents must confirm the facts described in the complaint.
  • Confirmation of payment for filing a complaint.

The complaint itself must contain the following components: description of the facts referred to in the complaint; arguments, that is, confirmation of the position of the subject of the appeal; references to relevant articles of the Law of Ukraine “On Public Procurement”.
After accepting the complaint, the Antimonopoly Committee must consider it no later than 10 working days, making a decision on its non-satisfaction / satisfaction / partial satisfaction. In the presence of appropriate arguments, the period for consideration of the complaint can be extended for another 10 working days.

When disputing the results of the procurement, the Customer has no right to make changes to the terms of the tender, except for those capable of eliminating the violations specified in the complaint. It is also prohibited to enter into new purchase contracts. Although the Customer can independently eliminate the violations specified in the complaint, the renewal of the tender can take place only after the completion of the review of the complaint by the Antimonopoly Committee.

 

Thus, contesting procurement results involves the following stages:

  1. Filing a complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine.
  2. Payment for the service of submitting a complaint to the appeal body (its amount is determined by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine).
  3. Making a final decision by the Antimonopoly Committee.

The review of the complaint is open. If desired, both the Customer and the Complainant (Applicant) can be present during the case review. To obtain additional consultations, the Antimonopoly Committee may engage experts, third-party specialists who have the knowledge necessary for an impartial and professional review of the complaint. All received conclusions are made public on the site and are added to the materials of the general case regarding the appeal of the procurement results.

The legal interests and rights of the Complainant are protected by the Customer’s obligation to review/cancel the decision to cancel the procurement procedure until the violations are eliminated.

Decisions made by the Antimonopoly Committee become effective from the moment of their adoption and are binding for the Customer. The rendered decision can be appealed in court within 30 days from the moment of its publication in the electronic procurement system.

 

Why exactly “PRIKHODKO & PARTNERS” to contest the procurement results?

Undoubtedly, the procedure for contesting procurement results is quite complex and requires considerable experience. In the process of preparing a complaint, a large number of nuances that affect the final decision should be taken into account. It is also very important to monitor the timely implementation of decisions made by the Antimonopoly Committee. All this is in the scope of professional activity of the lawyers of “PRIKHODKO & PARTNERS”.

We carry out:

  • Study of documents.
  • Detailed analysis of the problem.
  • We provide recommendations on ways to resolve the issue.
  • We control the implementation of decisions of the Antimonopoly Committee.
  • We guarantee protection of the Client’s interests.

The appeal of the procurement results in the tender will be conducted qualitatively and as quickly as possible. Do you still have questions? We are waiting for consultations! Fill out the form below to calculate the price of a lawyer’s assistance in contesting public procurement.

Calculate the cost of services

1 question

Do you need to dispute tender results in the Prozorro system?

Yes
No

2 question

Are there more than 3 participants in the tender?

Yes
No

3 question

Have you participated in other tenders before this?

Yes
No

4 question

Do you need legal assistance urgently?

Yes
No

You may also need:

20%
discount
If we do not
call back
during the day
Consultation
Law company
Leave a request for legal assistance right now:
9+ years on the market
70+ professional practitioners
Fixed price
Online / offline consultation

Support of tenders

Analysis of competitors’ bids at the tender Answer to the complaint to the antimonopoly committee Anti-corruption program for tender Appeal against cancellation of purchase Appeal against the rejection of a tender offer Appeal of wrongful disqualification or the decision to determine the winner of the tender Appealing against the unlawful recognition of the winner Appealing decisions of the Antimonopoly Committee Appealing tender procedures through the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Appealing the decision of AMCU on public procurement Appealing the decision of the tender committee Appealing the decisions of tender customers through the court Appealing the tender customer’s decision on disqualification Attorney for tenders and public procurement Audit of tender documentation before publication Certificate of no debt for participation in the tender Challenging the conditions of the tender documentation Challenging the terms of the tender documentation Checking tender documentation for discriminatory benefits Complaint against the tender customer’s decision Complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU) about tender purchases Consultations on public procurement Contesting the procurement results in the Prozorro tender Coordination of changes to the terms and conditions of a public procurement contract Development of individual tender documentation Development of tender documentation Development of tender documentation without discriminatory requirements and violations Disputing the conditions of purchase on Prozoro Explanation to AMKU about the purchase Filing a complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Formation of certificates, letters of guarantee, documents to confirm the qualifications of the tenderer How to announce a tender in Prozorro ISO 9001 certification for participation in the tender Legal support for public procurement in Ukraine Legal support of tenders Legal support of the tender Legal verification of the correctness of the tender proposal Localization of production of goods in public procurement Prozorro Negotiated procurement procedure Preparation and assistance in filing complaints about discriminatory terms of tender documentation Preparation of tender documentation Preparation of tender documentation for bidding with Features Preparation of tender documentation for the tender customer Preparation of the company for the tender Preparing a complaint about the wrongful rejection of the Participant’s proposal Protection in the event of termination of the contract at the initiative of the tender customer Protection of officials of the tender winner during inspections by the AMCU, DASU, Accounting Chamber, NABU Protection of the interests of the Customers in AMKU Protection of the interests of the winning bidder during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it Providing a tender offer to tenderers Representation during the consideration of complaints in the Commission of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for the consideration of complaints about violations of legislation in the field of public procurement (AMCU) Response to the tender complaint in the Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU) Selection of tenders on a turnkey basis Simplified procurement Support of public buyers Support of public procurement appeals at AMKU Support of tender purchases Support of turnkey public tenders Tender lawyer Tender specialist services Tender support Verification of tender offers