Lawyer for violation of customs regulations

Lawyer for violation of customs regulations

Author

Prykhodko Andrii

Lawyer for violation of customs regulations

Government representatives from time to time report on the huge number of recorded violations of customs rules, and, accordingly, on the impressive revenues to the state budget due to the imposition of fines and other sanctions. At the same time, the application of such sanctions is not always consistent with the norms of the law, the “violators” recognized by the customs service are not always such.Andrey Prikhodko

How is a customs violation lawyer helpful?

For your information! It is advisable to use the services of a lawyer before a problem with the customs service arises. In particular, the specialists of Prikhodko & Partners Law Firm offer consulting services on the application of legislative norms in the field of violation of customs rules (chapters 67, 68, 69, 71, 72 and 73 of the Customs Code, as well as other regulatory legal acts).

 

If a problem arose, a protocol was drawn up in violation of customs rules and/or a resolution was issued to bring the person to the administrator. responsibility – the lawyer considers options for solving:

filing a complaint with a higher customs authority;

filing an administrative claim with a court.

Such steps are regulated by Articles 529-533 of the Customs Code. At the same time, adherence to the deadlines and procedure for appeals is of fundamental importance.

For your information! Administrative liability for violations of customs rules occurs if these violations do not entail criminal liability.

 

Three types of admin are applied. responsibility:

Person protection strategy in cases of violation of customs regulations

Decisions are made to hold a person liable for violation of customs rules by the customs authority or court. Who exactly is considering the case depends on the type of violation (Article 522 of the Customs Code). Accordingly, it is possible to appeal against the decision:

• at a higher customs authority;
• in the court of first instance;
• in the court of appeal.

The strategy of protecting the interests of a person in such circumstances is based on the recognition of the inadmissibility / non-ownership of the evidence presented by the customs service.

How we work: