Specializes in protection of honor and dignity, of copyrights, inventions, patents, trademarks, support of tenders, protection of consumer rights, disputes with insurance companies, legal support in cases of administrative offenses.

Contact now
Appealing the decisions of tender customers through the court

Appealing the decisions of tender customers through the court

Almost every one of us, unfortunately, was forced at least once to learn what a court, a court decision, its appeal is. It is always stressful for ordinary citizens. Going to court is a forced step aimed at protecting the legitimate interests and rights of the individual.
An important element of a modern procurement system is the ability to appeal customer decisions.

Such an opportunity, on the one hand, has a positive effect on strengthening the system itself, on the other hand, it allows public procurement providers to correctly interpret the requirements that apply to them. If you need to appeal the decision of customers through the court, PRIKHODKO & PARTNERS specialists will help you with this.

Features of the legislative framework

The procedure for consideration and consideration of complaints, the list of decisions taken by the appeal body is regulated by Article 18 of the Law of Ukraine “Procedure for Appeal of Procurement Procedures”. In addition, the second part of Article 18 of the Public Procurement Law states that complaints related to the Procurement Agreement can be appealed through the courts. Important: the decisions of the body of the Board of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine can be appealed by the customer in court within 30 days from the moment the decisions were made in the electronic procurement system.

The Administrative Board for Considering a Complaint on Violation of Legislation in the Sphere of Public Procurement is a permanent body of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine.

The main evidence in the process of considering the case is the tender documentation of the customer, as well as the documentation that the complainant provided / did not provide. The customer must prove that the participant really did not provide the necessary documents or provided them with certain violations.

What decisions can be challenged?

  • Litigation related to procurement can be varied. Among the main ones:
  • Complaints on tender documentation, inaction/decisions of the customer

The complaint is relevant in the event that the deadline set for the submission of tender proposals has not expired. Such complaints may be submitted no later than 4 days before the date set for the submission of proposals for tenders.

 Cost of appealing customer decisions

Subjects of appeal at this stage have the right to appeal against the illegality of the conditions specified in the tender documentation. Among such conditions, in particular, discrimination of suppliers due to certain technical specifications.

Important: the subject of the appeal must make sure that his complaint can be called exhaustive. Submission after some time of additional complaints concerning other aspects of the tender documents is not allowed. It is impossible to appeal the tender documentation later than the specified period.

  • Complaints related to decisions made, inaction, actions of the customer that occurred after consideration of the tender documents

The procedure for considering such complaints is provided for by parts 2 and 12 of Article 29 of the Law.

They are submitted within 5 days from the date of publication of the complaint in the electronic procurement system. At this stage, it is possible to appeal against the decision to admit tenders of bidding suppliers.

In the case of a simplified purchase, the claim may relate to decisions of the purchaser made after the auction. It will not be possible to demand amendments to the simplified procurement in a judicial proceeding. The only thing that can be done is to demand that the decision of the Commissioner for Simplified Procurement be declared illegal and canceled. The main thing is the question of expediency.

In most cases, bidders who are dissatisfied with the customer’s decisions give advance notice of this by submitting a demand in the electronic procurement system.

Why PRIKHODKO & PARTNERS?

Appealing decisions of customers through the court is one of the activities of PRIKHODKO & PARTNERS lawyers. Without a doubt, everyone should mind their own business. Only real professionals will allow you to achieve the desired result – to get a profitable contract or challenge the decision of customers.

Sign up for a consultation through the feedback form. We will definitely find the best ways to solve your problem.

Calculate the cost of services

1 question

Do you need to appeal the tender customer's decision in court?

Yes
No

2 question

Have you taken part in tenders before?

Yes
No

3 question

Do you participate in more than 3 tenders per month?

Yes
No

You may also need:

20%
discount
If we do not
call back
during the day
Consultation
Law company
Leave a request for legal assistance right now:
9+ years on the market
70+ professional practitioners
Fixed price
Online / offline consultation

Support of tenders

Analysis of competitors’ bids at the tender Answer to the complaint to the antimonopoly committee Anti-corruption program for tender Appeal against cancellation of purchase Appeal against the rejection of a tender offer Appeal of wrongful disqualification or the decision to determine the winner of the tender Appealing against the unlawful recognition of the winner Appealing decisions of the Antimonopoly Committee Appealing tender procedures through the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Appealing the decision of AMCU on public procurement Appealing the decision of the tender committee Appealing the decisions of tender customers through the court Appealing the tender customer’s decision on disqualification Attorney for tenders and public procurement Audit of tender documentation before publication Certificate of no debt for participation in the tender Challenging the conditions of the tender documentation Challenging the terms of the tender documentation Checking tender documentation for discriminatory benefits Complaint against the tender customer’s decision Complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU) about tender purchases Consultations on public procurement Contesting the procurement results in the Prozorro tender Coordination of changes to the terms and conditions of a public procurement contract Development of individual tender documentation Development of tender documentation Development of tender documentation without discriminatory requirements and violations Disputing the conditions of purchase on Prozoro Explanation to AMKU about the purchase Filing a complaint to the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Formation of certificates, letters of guarantee, documents to confirm the qualifications of the tenderer How to announce a tender in Prozorro ISO 9001 certification for participation in the tender Legal support for public procurement in Ukraine Legal support of tenders Legal support of the tender Legal verification of the correctness of the tender proposal Localization of production of goods in public procurement Prozorro Negotiated procurement procedure Preparation and assistance in filing complaints about discriminatory terms of tender documentation Preparation of tender documentation Preparation of tender documentation for bidding with Features Preparation of tender documentation for the tender customer Preparation of the company for the tender Preparing a complaint about the wrongful rejection of the Participant’s proposal Protection in the event of termination of the contract at the initiative of the tender customer Protection of officials of the tender winner during inspections by the AMCU, DASU, Accounting Chamber, NABU Protection of the interests of the Customers in AMKU Protection of the interests of the winning bidder during the conclusion of the procurement contract and amendments to it Providing a tender offer to tenderers Representation during the consideration of complaints in the Commission of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for the consideration of complaints about violations of legislation in the field of public procurement (AMCU) Response to the tender complaint in the Antimonopoly Committee (AMCU) Selection of tenders on a turnkey basis Simplified procurement Support of public buyers Support of public procurement appeals at AMKU Support of tender purchases Support of turnkey public tenders Tender lawyer Tender specialist services Tender support Verification of tender offers