Head of International Corporate Law and Fintech Practice
Expert in fintech, crypto, and international corporate law with over 20 years of experience. Specializes in crypto licensing (VASP/CASP), iGaming business support, and international structuring, asset protection, and OSINT analytics for risk assessment and due diligence.
Case: Helped open a bank account for a dating business through a Legal Opinion
Service: Legal Opinion
A client approached the law firm “Prikhodko & Partners” — the owner of an international online dating project.
The core issue was not the business itself, but its infrastructure: the client was consistently receiving refusals from banks and payment institutions (EMIs) when attempting to open accounts.
The formal reason — “high-risk activity”.
Why banks were rejecting the dating business
Banks classified the project as:
- a high-risk digital business;
- potentially related to the adult segment;
- having elevated AML/CFT risks;
- featuring a non-transparent payment structure.
At the same time, the business:
- was fully legal;
- did not provide adult content;
- operated as a standard dating service;
- had a clear monetization model (subscription + in-app purchases).
The issue was not the activity itself, but how it was interpreted by banks.
Critical phase: what happens without a bank account
- inability to open an account → blocked operations;
- risk of business disruption;
- rejection by payment providers;
- loss of partners due to “high-risk” status.
In practice, the business could not scale.
Our approach: not explanations, but a legal position
At “Prikhodko & Partners”, we do not rely on “explanatory letters”. We build a legal position that bank compliance teams can actually work with.
We broke the project down into key components:
- service type (dating vs adult);
- monetization mechanics;
- user interaction model;
- payment structure;
- company jurisdiction.
The key objective was to demonstrate that this is not a high-risk segment in the traditional sense.
AML/CFT and financial model analysis
We reviewed:
- source of funds;
- transactional model;
- customer geography;
- high-risk jurisdictions;
- transaction history.
Based on this, we built a profile demonstrating the absence of suspicious activity indicators and a controlled business model.
Legal structure and business transparency
We separately substantiated:
- the company’s legal status;
- absence of sanctions-related risks;
- compliance of the corporate structure with banking requirements;
- transparency of beneficial ownership.
Legal Opinion as a compliance tool
We prepared a Legal Opinion that:
- clearly distinguishes dating from adult business;
- explains the economic model;
- supports a low/medium risk profile;
- confirms compliance with AML/CFT standards;
- forms a clear position for banks and EMIs.
This was not a “letter”, but a working compliance tool.
Account opening support
We:
- adapted the position to specific banks;
- responded to compliance queries;
- explained the model through legal logic, not marketing;
- supported the onboarding process.
Result: account opened and high-risk status removed
- the client successfully opened an account with a European financial institution;
- the “high-risk” classification was removed;
- payment infrastructure was restored;
- the business regained its ability to scale.
Why banks often misclassify high-risk businesses
In 80% of cases, the issue is not the business itself, but how it is perceived by banks.
Dating, crypto, gaming, affiliate — these categories are often automatically treated as “high-risk”.
However, risk is determined not by the label, but by structure, cash flows, and compliance.
Typical mistakes businesses make with banks
- lack of a clear legal position;
- business described in marketing terms rather than legal terms;
- absence of AML/CFT justification;
- structure appears non-transparent to the bank.
How we help businesses pass compliance
- analyze the business as a bank compliance officer would;
- build a position that passes KYC/AML checks;
- prepare Legal Opinions that actually work in practice;
- support account opening end-to-end.
“High-risk” is not a verdict — it is a matter of proper legal qualification.
The client’s dating business did not change. Only its interpretation for the bank did.
If your business is facing bank refusals, account blocks, or a high-risk classification — the question is not whether you can open an account, but how your business is legally presented.