Lawyer
Expert in international corporate, IT, and crypto law. Has extensive experience in business setup and support in the USA, EU, LATAM, and the Middle East. Specializes in corporate structuring, compliance, KYC/AML, IP, GDPR, as well as regulation of crypto and fintech projects.
Case: Protected a Social Media Account with an Audience of Over 300,000 Followers After Blocking
Client: owner of a large content project / digital asset.
Jurisdiction: international online platform; European element of communication.
Period of work: 2026.
Grounds for request
The client contacted us after losing access to an account on a popular social network. The account had an audience of over 300,000 followers and was used as a key channel for communication, promotion and monetization.
For the client, this was not just a social media profile, but an actual digital asset created over a long period of time. The blocking threatened the audience, commercial arrangements, reputation and further activity of the project.
Additional complication
- standard appeals to the support service did not produce a proper result;
- the platform acted within its own rules, which are not always transparent to the user;
- it was necessary to prove not only the fact of blocking, but also the commercial value of the account;
- there was a risk of losing the audience, advertising integrations and accumulated content.
Actions of the lawyers of “Prikhodko and Partners”
1. Analysis of the platform rules and factual circumstances of blocking
We examined the platform’s terms of use, appeal mechanisms, available communication channels and circumstances that could have affected the blocking of the account.
2. Formation of the evidence base
Materials were collected confirming the client’s ownership of the account, its audience, commercial role, history of use and consequences of losing access.
3. Preparation of a pre-trial legal position
We prepared a legally structured claim to the platform setting out the client’s position, describing the affected interests and demands for reconsideration of the situation.
4. Recommendations on further escalation
The client received an algorithm for further actions: from communication with the platform to the possible involvement of local consultants or the use of regulatory mechanisms in the relevant jurisdiction.
Result
- the client received a legally formalized position for communication with the platform;
- a package of evidence regarding the value and ownership of the digital asset was prepared;
- the situation was moved from the level of “support request” to the plane of legal protection;
- the client received a strategy for further protection of the account and minimization of losses.
Practical conclusions
- An account with a large audience is an asset that may have significant commercial value.
- In disputes with platforms, it is important to document not only the blocking, but also the consequences for the business or project.
- A legal claim must be based on the platform’s rules, evidence and specific demands, not only on an emotional description of the problem.
- Businesses and public projects should preserve in advance evidence of control over accounts, statistics, contracts with advertisers and backup communication channels.
How we can help
- analyze the client’s situation and identify legally relevant risks;
- prepare the evidence base, documents and legal position for communication with counterparties, banks, platforms or donors;
- support negotiations, claim communication and further legal actions;
- build a legal model that works not only “on paper”, but also in the client’s real operational activity.
If your social media account has been blocked and standard appeals to the support service do not bring results, the lawyers of “Prikhodko and Partners” will help prepare an evidence base, legal position and pre-trial claim to the online platform.