ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR A LAWYER – WHO IS BETTER?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is finding more and more applications in the field of jurisprudence and legal activity. Here are some examples of legal projects that already use artificial intelligence:

• Document automation: AI can be used to automate the processes of creating and processing legal documents. It can generate contracts, agreements, claims, etc., based on certain templates and requirements, which speeds up lawyers' work processes and reduces the possibility of errors.
• Legal data analysis: AI can be used to analyze large amounts of legal data, including court decisions, precedents, legal acts and other sources of information. It can highlight key facts, identify dependencies between court decisions, advise lawyers on the likely outcome of court cases, and provide support in the decision-making process.
• Virtual assistants and consultants: AI can be used to create virtual legal assistants or consultants that provide legal support and advice to users. They can answer questions about legal procedures, provide information about rights and responsibilities, and help understand complex legal issues.
• Risk Prediction: AI can be used to predict risks in legal cases and help determine the likelihood of success in legal proceedings. He can analyze previous court decisions, assess the strengths and weaknesses of the case, and make recommendations to achieve the best outcome.

These are just a few examples of the use of artificial intelligence in legal projects, and the list could be much larger. The development of artificial intelligence technologies opens up new opportunities for improving the efficiency and accuracy of legal activity.

The question of who advises better - a lawyer or artificial intelligence (AI) does not have a clear answer. Both have their advantages and limitations, and effectiveness depends on the specific situation and task.

Lawyer

• Expertise: Lawyers, particularly experienced and highly qualified ones, have considerable expertise in their field. They have knowledge of the law, precedents and practical experience working with clients.
• Contextual understanding: Lawyers can consider the context, the individual characteristics of the client and the complexity of the case. They can consider ethical, social and legal aspects of decision-making.
• Flexibility and creativity: Lawyers can apply flexibility and creativity to solving complex legal problems, taking into account the unique circumstances of each case.

Artificial Intelligence

• Processing large volumes of data: AI can quickly and efficiently analyze large volumes of legal data, identify patterns and trends, which allows you to make informed recommendations and forecasts.
• Objectivity: AI can be objective in its decisions because it is based on logical algorithms and data analysis, without being influenced by emotions.
• Speed and efficiency: AI can work faster than a human when processing large amounts of information.

The question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) can completely replace the lawyer is a complex and debatable one. To date, AI already shows significant potential in improving the efficiency and accuracy of legal activities, but its ability to completely replace humans in the legal field is limited. Here are a few factors to consider:

• Complexity and unstructuredness: Many legal tasks require a high level of understanding of the context, subjectivity, identification of creative solutions and consideration of ethical aspects. Some situations may require social skills, negotiation, and influencing others that are characteristic of human presence.
• Responsibility and ethics: Making important decisions, especially in the field of justice, requires ethical understanding, responsibility and the ability to consider human values. So far, AI cannot empathize or morally consider issues on the same level as humans.
• Lack of data and training: For AI to work effectively, large amounts of high-quality and structured data are required. In the legal industry, there is a lot of unstructured and complex information that is difficult to automatically process. Lack of data distorts the quality of results that AI can provide.
• Interaction with clients: A lawyer's work often involves personal interaction with clients, understanding their needs and circumstances. Interpersonal skills and the ability to communicate are important elements that may be difficult to fully transfer to AI.

While AI can perform certain legal tasks faster and more accurately, it is difficult to imagine that it will be able to completely replace all aspects of a lawyer's work, especially in situations that require creativity, ethics, social influence and understanding of human needs. The optimal approach is to combine human skills with artificial intelligence to achieve better results in the legal field.

Today, there are several services and platforms where you can compare the work of a lawyer and artificial intelligence. Some of them include:

• Lex Machina: This is a platform that uses artificial intelligence to analyze data about court cases and provides information on the outcome of court proceedings, the behavior of judges and lawyers.
• ROSS Intelligence: This service uses artificial intelligence to understand lawyers' queries and provides them with information from legal sources such as legislation, precedents and commentaries.
• Casetext: This is a platform that combines artificial intelligence with the collective intelligence of lawyers. It allows you to quickly find and analyze court decisions and other legal sources.
• DoNotPay: This service uses artificial intelligence to provide legal assistance in various areas such as parking complaints, subscription refunds and other practical legal issues.
• The first Ukrainian legal marketplace (https://consultant.net.ua/) Online, it provides an opportunity to compare the consultation of AI and real lawyers, as well as to watch for free the consultations that have already taken place on the project with the participation of AI.

Separately, we recommend viewing such consultations at the link https://consultant.net.ua/statti

It is important to note that each of these services has its own characteristics and limitations. Comparing the work of a lawyer and artificial intelligence on these platforms can help gain insights and benefits of using AI technologies in the legal industry. However, it should always be borne in mind that the final decision and the final responsibility for it remain on the shoulders of the lawyer.